Jerry Zeniuk (1945*) New Paintings
“Just what is so great about making an abstract painting?” A current exhibition review (J. Voss, Joan Mitchell FAZ 6.12.08) posed this question right from the start. What is all this talk of an epochal revolutionary shift towards abstract visual language? Was it not more a matter of fostering a macho and heroic demeanor and the decoupling from reality? This misses the point that the path to non-representationality was a logically consequential and self-evident process for many modern artists and that this step did not mean rejection, but an expansion of the connection to reality. The point of origin was the discovery of the intrinsic value of the means of painting and the painting process. Conceptions of images, the creation of a coherent pictorial organism thus became a possibility and a priority. For the painters, the relationship to the medium was unbroken and non-speculative. They followed the traces of their actions. As an analogy to the physical paint substance and brush stroke, the paintings are imbued with an erotic energy, as it were, giving them a sensual presence. The elements and media that prove themselves in this way are wholly indebted to the long history of painting. It attests to the close interrelation of the technique and theory of pictorial art. The painter is the one who knows what he does. “The art of painting can only be judged by those who are themselves good painters. For all others, it is as inscrutable as a foreign language is for you.” (Albrecht Dürer) With his experience, the artist expands the visual knowledge and makes new visual knowledge available. This brings up thoughts of color: coloring power, modulation, the relationship of the colors to one another, among one another constitute a set of themes that is nearly unmanageable and inexhaustible in its complexity. Color is part of the world we live in, affiliated with the most elementary experiences of the world. Painting has never merely depicted what is visible, but rather it creates something visible as art. This is constant, continuous and does not exist in this form in reality. The fantastic wealth of pictorial worlds is the real raison d’être of painting. Our view of the world is shaped by these pictorial worlds. Art is oftentimes capable of achieving this, but there are also phases in which artists are not up to the task.
Back to being self-evident. The desire to understand is apt to force its way ahead of this self-evident implicitness, which itself is not to be attained without some effort. In any case, the need to translate anything and everything into a text seems overpowering. Those standing before the paintings press corresponding prostheses for understanding to their ears to listen to the paintings. Any connection to the history of painting that lies within its means is essentially broken off, interrupted. Non-representationality carries the smell of failure, of failing. Of course, normally the self-evident aspects that artists claim for themselves eventually become common property, following a historic incubation period. In the case of abstract painting, for once this does not seem to apply. Yet perhaps this represents an opportunity for a not yet depleted energy in a scene of the depleted.
But now onto the exhibition of new paintings by Jerry Zeniuk. He means what he paints and has thus painted necessary paintings for many years. We do not wish to use words to win over or over-discuss. This is a plea for these necessary paintings and a guide to their observation.
James Bishop, Robert Mangold, Fred Sandback and Friends
September 29 to November 24, 2018
AGNES MARTIN Religion of Love | RICHARD TUTTLE Illustration
Publishers: Estate of Agnes Martin Dream Tree Project, Inc. Richard Tuttle Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König, Cologne, Germany
Paintings on Paper
Editors: Michael Semff, Gianfranco Verna